BackAnheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV Overview

Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV Net Tangible Assets

Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV's net tangible assets is $98B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$97.74B
10.19% YoYΔ $9.04B vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUDFF) FAQ

Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV posts a net tangible assets of $98B as of March 2026. That compares with $89B in the prior-year period — up 10.2% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV's net tangible assets was $89B. The latest reading is $98B — a 10.2% year-over-year increase (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV's financial statement story. At $98B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for BUDFF's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV against Consumer Staples peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Staples are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $98B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.