BackBritish American Tobacco p.l.c. Overview

British American Tobacco p.l.c. Minority Interest

Latest minority interest for BTAFF: $210M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Minority Interest
$214.45M
29.23% YoYΔ $-88.55M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

British American Tobacco p.l.c. Minority Interest History

Loading

British American Tobacco p.l.c. vs. peers: Minority Interest Comparison

Loading

British American Tobacco p.l.c. Minority Interest Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

British American Tobacco p.l.c. (BTAFF) FAQ

British American Tobacco p.l.c. posts a minority interest of $210M as of June 2026. That compares with $300M in the prior-year period — down 29.2% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, British American Tobacco p.l.c.'s minority interest was $300M. The latest reading is $210M — a 29.2% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Minority Interest is one piece of British American Tobacco p.l.c.'s financial statement story. At $210M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for BTAFF's minority interest usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; British American Tobacco p.l.c.'s other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging British American Tobacco p.l.c. against Consumer Staples peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Staples are more comparable, which makes gaps in minority interest easier to interpret. Start with $210M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.