BackBassett Furniture Industries Overview
Bassett Furniture Industries Inc.

Bassett Furniture Industries PEG Ratio

Valuation check: BSET's PEG ratio is 475.34, above the Industrials sector average of 11.64.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

PEG Ratio

475.34

PEG Ratio

475.34

The PEG ratio measures a stock's valuation relative to its earnings growth rate. A PEG ratio below 1.0 may indicate that the stock is undervalued relative to its growth potential.

Average PEG Ratio (Comparison Companies)

Loading

PEG Ratio History

Loading

PEG Ratio Comparison

Loading

Bassett Furniture Industries (BSET) FAQ

Bassett Furniture Industries posts a PEG ratio of 475.34. That is above the Industrials sector average of 11.64. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

For Industrials stocks, a PEG ratio near 11.64 is typical. Bassett Furniture Industries's 475.34 is higher that level. That is roughly 3984.3% above the sector mean. Whether that is a warning or an opportunity depends on growth outlook and other fundamentals shown elsewhere on Stockcircle.

Bassett Furniture Industries's PEG ratio of 475.34 comes from dividing a price-based measure by a related financial statistic. Changes can come from the stock price moving, the underlying fundamental shifting, or both. Track both the level and the trend — a rising multiple on falling fundamentals is a different story than a rising multiple on rising earnings.

Context for BSET's PEG ratio usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers (average 11.64), and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Bassett Furniture Industries's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Bassett Furniture Industries against Industrials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Industrials are more comparable, which makes gaps in PEG ratio easier to interpret. Start with 475.34 here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.