BackBrookfield Renewable Partners L.P. Overview

Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. Total Liabilities

Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.'s total liabilities is $61B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Liabilities
$60.82B
↓ 6.82% YoYΔ $-4.45B vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. Total Liabilities History

Loading

Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. vs. peers: Total Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. Total Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BRENF) FAQ

Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. posts a total liabilities of $61B as of June 2026. That compares with $65B in the prior-year period — down 6.8% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.'s total liabilities was $65B. The latest reading is $61B — a 6.8% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Liabilities is one piece of Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.'s financial statement story. At $61B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for BRENF's total liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.'s other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. against Utilities peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Utilities are more comparable, which makes gaps in total liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $61B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.