BackBlade Air Mobility Overview

Blade Air Mobility Other Current Liabilities

Track Blade Air Mobility's other current liabilities ($20M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Other Current Liabilities
$19.95M
89.96% YoYΔ $9.45M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Blade Air Mobility Other Current Liabilities History

Loading

Blade Air Mobility vs. peers: Other Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Blade Air Mobility Other Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Blade Air Mobility (BLDE) FAQ

Blade Air Mobility posts a other current liabilities of $20M as of March 2026. That compares with $11M in the prior-year period — up 90.0% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Blade Air Mobility's other current liabilities was $11M. The latest reading is $20M — a 90.0% year-over-year increase (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Other Current Liabilities is one piece of Blade Air Mobility's financial statement story. At $20M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for BLDE's other current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Blade Air Mobility's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Blade Air Mobility against Industrials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Industrials are more comparable, which makes gaps in other current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $20M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.