BackBelden Overview
Belden Inc

Belden Target Price

See Belden's analyst price targets ($160) vs the current share price.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

Share Price

$104.15

Average Target Price

$155.0048.8% upside

3 analysts in the last 4 months

High: $170 | Low: $140

Analyst Recommendations

No recommendations in the last 4 months.

Revenue & Income Forecast

Analysts' Target Prices

DateAnalystPrice TargetCurrent Upside/Downside
2026-09-23NeedhamRobert Jamieson$14034.4% upsideOpen
2026-08-19D.A. DavidsonChris Dankert$17063.2% upsideOpen
2026-07-02Truist Financial$15548.8% upsideOpen
2026-06-15D.A. Davidson$15548.8% upsideOpen
2025-12-19Truist FinancialWilliam Stein$15044% upsideOpen
2024-11-07Loop Capital MarketsChris Dankert$15548.8% upsideOpen
2024-09-16Loop Capital MarketsChris Dankert$12015.2% upsideOpen
2024-09-16Goldman SachsMark Delaney$12419.1% upsideOpen
2024-07-05Truist FinancialWilliam Stein$12318.1% upsideOpen
2024-06-14Truist FinancialWilliam Stein$11914.3% upsideOpen
2024-05-17Loop Capital MarketsChris Dankert$11510.4% upsideOpen
2022-04-20Goldman Sachs$5547.2% downsideOpen

Belden (BDC) FAQ

Belden posts a target price of $160. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

A target price of $160 for BDC means covering analysts, on average, see the stock 48.8% upside of $104.15 over about 12 months. Dig into who set the high and low targets and how recently they updated — freshness matters as much as the average itself.

Context for BDC's target price usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Belden's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Belden against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in target price easier to interpret. Start with $160 here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.