BackArena Group Holdings(The) Overview

Arena Group Holdings(The) Net Tangible Assets

Arena Group Holdings(The)'s net tangible assets is $-7.6M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$-7.55M
4594.05% YoYΔ $-7.72M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Arena Group Holdings(The) Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

Arena Group Holdings(The) vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Arena Group Holdings(The) Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Arena Group Holdings(The) (AREN) FAQ

Arena Group Holdings(The) posts a net tangible assets of $-7.6M as of June 2026. That compares with $170K in the prior-year period — down 4594.0% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Arena Group Holdings(The)'s net tangible assets was $170K. The latest reading is $-7.6M — a 4594.0% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of Arena Group Holdings(The)'s financial statement story. At $-7.6M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for AREN's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Arena Group Holdings(The)'s other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Arena Group Holdings(The) against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $-7.6M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.