BackA-Mark Precious Metals Overview

A-Mark Precious Metals Total Current Liabilities

A-Mark Precious Metals's total current liabilities is $3.1B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Current Liabilities
$3.12B
176.28% YoYΔ $1.99B vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

A-Mark Precious Metals Total Current Liabilities History

Loading

A-Mark Precious Metals vs. peers: Total Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

A-Mark Precious Metals Total Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

A-Mark Precious Metals (AMRK) FAQ

A-Mark Precious Metals posts a total current liabilities of $3.1B as of March 2026. That compares with $1.1B in the prior-year period — up 176.3% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, A-Mark Precious Metals's total current liabilities was $1.1B. The latest reading is $3.1B — a 176.3% year-over-year increase (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Current Liabilities is one piece of A-Mark Precious Metals's financial statement story. At $3.1B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for AMRK's total current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; A-Mark Precious Metals's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging A-Mark Precious Metals against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in total current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $3.1B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.