BackAllied Motion Technologies Overview

Allied Motion Technologies Common Stock

Latest common stock for AMOT: $110M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Common Stock
$114.55M
1.74% YoYΔ $1.96M vs prior year quarter

Peer average / median

Loading

Allied Motion Technologies Common Stock History

Loading

Allied Motion Technologies vs. peers: Common Stock Comparison

Loading

Allied Motion Technologies Common Stock Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company). Positive growth indicates new issuance/dilution; negative growth indicates reductions/buybacks.

Loading

Allied Motion Technologies (AMOT) FAQ

Allied Motion Technologies posts a common stock of $110M as of June 2026. That compares with $110M in the prior-year period — up 1.7% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Allied Motion Technologies's common stock was $110M. The latest reading is $110M — a 1.7% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Common Stock is one piece of Allied Motion Technologies's financial statement story. At $110M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for AMOT's common stock usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Allied Motion Technologies's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Allied Motion Technologies against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in common stock easier to interpret. Start with $110M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.