BackCenturion Acquisition Overview

Centurion Acquisition Common Stock

Track Centurion Acquisition's common stock ($110M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Common Stock
$108.09M
64.21% YoYΔ $-193.95M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Centurion Acquisition Common Stock History

Loading

Centurion Acquisition vs. peers: Common Stock Comparison

Loading

Centurion Acquisition Common Stock Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company). Positive growth indicates new issuance/dilution; negative growth indicates reductions/buybacks.

Loading

Centurion Acquisition (ALF) FAQ

Centurion Acquisition posts a common stock of $110M as of June 2026. That compares with $300M in the prior-year period — down 64.2% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Centurion Acquisition's common stock was $300M. The latest reading is $110M — a 64.2% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Common Stock is one piece of Centurion Acquisition's financial statement story. At $110M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for ALF's common stock usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Centurion Acquisition's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Centurion Acquisition against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in common stock easier to interpret. Start with $110M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.