BackAerojet Rocketdyne Holdings Overview
Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings Inc

Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings PEG Ratio

Valuation check: AJRD's PEG ratio is 17460.03, above the Industrials sector average of 14.4.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

PEG Ratio

17460.03

PEG Ratio

17460.03

The PEG ratio measures a stock's valuation relative to its earnings growth rate. A PEG ratio below 1.0 may indicate that the stock is undervalued relative to its growth potential.

PEG Ratio (Comparison Companies)

Loading

PEG Ratio History

Loading

PEG Ratio Comparison

Loading

Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings (AJRD) FAQ

Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings posts a PEG ratio of 17460.03. That is above the Industrials sector average of 14.4. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

For Industrials stocks, a PEG ratio near 14.4 is typical. Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings's 17460.03 is higher that level. That is roughly 121118.8% above the sector mean. Whether that is a warning or an opportunity depends on growth outlook and other fundamentals shown elsewhere on Stockcircle.

Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings's PEG ratio of 17460.03 comes from dividing a price-based measure by a related financial statistic. Changes can come from the stock price moving, the underlying fundamental shifting, or both. Track both the level and the trend — a rising multiple on falling fundamentals is a different story than a rising multiple on rising earnings.

Context for AJRD's PEG ratio usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers (average 14.4), and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings against Industrials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Industrials are more comparable, which makes gaps in PEG ratio easier to interpret. Start with 17460.03 here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.