Astronics Corp.
ATRO
Get informed when a big investor buys or sells
+ Follow
Current Fair Value
35.5% downsideOvervalued by 35.5% based on the discounted cash flow analysis.
Share Statistics
| Market cap | $3.10 Billion |
|---|---|
| Enterprise Value | $3.49 Billion |
| Dividend Yield | $- (-) |
| Earnings per Share | $0.82 |
| Beta | 1.15 |
| Outstanding Shares | 38,223,000 |
Return
| Return on Equity | 28.06% |
|---|---|
| Return on Assets | 6.07% |
| Return on Invested Capital | 10.94% |
Valuation & Multiples
| P/E Ratio | 63.94 |
|---|---|
| PEG | 38.05 |
| Price to Sales | 3.6 |
| Price to Book Ratio | 20.68 |
| Enterprise Value to Revenue | 3.94 |
| Enterprise Value to EBIT | 54.19 |
| Enterprise Value to Net Income | 77 |
| Total Debt to Enterprise | 0.12 |
| Debt to Equity | 2.53 |
Revenue Sources
No data
Insider Trades
Last Earnings Call
Next Earnings Call
Institutional Put/Call Ratio
Market sentiment based on institutional option activity.
| Put/Call Ratio | 0.0623▲ 2.87% |
|---|---|
| Total Calls | 1,689,900▲ 92.30% |
| Total Puts | 105,300▲ 256.95% |
Institutional Ownership
Holdings and activity of institutional investors.
| Ownership % | 80.87%▼ 6.24% |
|---|---|
| Total Invested | $2.07B▲ 23.92% |
| Investors Holding | 300▲ 18.00% |
ESG Score
No data
About Astronics Corp.
CEO: Peter Gundermann Relevant Senate Committees
This committee allocates discretionary federal spending through its subcommittees, directly determining the precise funding for defense programs and procurement contracts, which is crucial for ammunition manufacturers.
This committee directly oversees the Department of Defense and authorizes the annual National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which determines procurement levels and funding for defense contractors, making it a primary driver of demand for ammunition.
Members receive classified briefings on global threats, which directly inform defense strategy and spending. This knowledge provides critical insight into future demand for defense products, including ammunition, offering significant informational asymmetry.