BackYongjin Technology Group , Ltd. Overview
Yongjin Technology Group Co., Ltd.

Yongjin Technology Group , Ltd. PEG Ratio

Latest PEG ratio for Yongjin Technology Group , Ltd.: 104.22 — see history and peer comparisons.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

PEG Ratio

104.22

PEG Ratio

104.22

The PEG ratio measures a stock's valuation relative to its earnings growth rate. A PEG ratio below 1.0 may indicate that the stock is undervalued relative to its growth potential.

PEG Ratio (Comparison Companies)

Loading

PEG Ratio History

Loading

PEG Ratio Comparison

Loading

Yongjin Technology Group , Ltd. (603995.SS) FAQ

Yongjin Technology Group , Ltd. posts a PEG ratio of 104.22. That is above the Materials sector average of 5.19. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

For Materials stocks, a PEG ratio near 5.19 is typical. Yongjin Technology Group , Ltd.'s 104.22 is higher that level. That is roughly 1908.3% above the sector mean. Whether that is a warning or an opportunity depends on growth outlook and other fundamentals shown elsewhere on Stockcircle.

Yongjin Technology Group , Ltd.'s PEG ratio of 104.22 comes from dividing a price-based measure by a related financial statistic. Changes can come from the stock price moving, the underlying fundamental shifting, or both. Track both the level and the trend — a rising multiple on falling fundamentals is a different story than a rising multiple on rising earnings.

Context for 603995.SS's PEG ratio usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers (average 5.19), and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Yongjin Technology Group , Ltd.'s other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Yongjin Technology Group , Ltd. against Materials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Materials are more comparable, which makes gaps in PEG ratio easier to interpret. Start with 104.22 here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.