BackGloria Material Technology Overview
Gloria Material Technology Corp.

Gloria Material Technology PEG Ratio

Latest PEG ratio for Gloria Material Technology: 53.62 — see history and peer comparisons.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

PEG Ratio

53.62

PEG Ratio

53.62

The PEG ratio measures a stock's valuation relative to its earnings growth rate. A PEG ratio below 1.0 may indicate that the stock is undervalued relative to its growth potential.

PEG Ratio (Comparison Companies)

Loading

PEG Ratio History

Loading

PEG Ratio Comparison

Loading

Gloria Material Technology (5009.TWO) FAQ

Gloria Material Technology posts a PEG ratio of 53.62. That is above the Materials sector average of 25.95. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

For Materials stocks, a PEG ratio near 25.95 is typical. Gloria Material Technology's 53.62 is higher that level. That is roughly 106.6% above the sector mean. Whether that is a warning or an opportunity depends on growth outlook and other fundamentals shown elsewhere on Stockcircle.

Gloria Material Technology's PEG ratio of 53.62 comes from dividing a price-based measure by a related financial statistic. Changes can come from the stock price moving, the underlying fundamental shifting, or both. Track both the level and the trend — a rising multiple on falling fundamentals is a different story than a rising multiple on rising earnings.

Context for 5009.TWO's PEG ratio usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers (average 25.95), and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Gloria Material Technology's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Gloria Material Technology against Materials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Materials are more comparable, which makes gaps in PEG ratio easier to interpret. Start with 53.62 here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.