BackInformation Strategy & Technology , Ltd. Overview
Information Strategy & Technology Co., Ltd.

Information Strategy & Technology , Ltd. Return on Equity

Latest ROE for Information Strategy & Technology , Ltd.: 21.13% — see history and peer comparisons.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

ROE

21.13%

Return on Equity

21.13%

Return on Equity measures how efficiently a company uses shareholders' equity to generate profits. A higher ROE indicates better profitability relative to equity.

ROE (Comparison Companies)

Loading

ROE History

Loading

ROE Comparison

Loading

Information Strategy & Technology , Ltd. (155A.T) FAQ

Information Strategy & Technology , Ltd. posts a ROE of 21.13%. That is below the Technology sector average of 40.55%. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

For Technology stocks, a ROE near 40.55% is typical. Information Strategy & Technology , Ltd.'s 21.13% is lower that level. That is roughly 47.9% below the sector mean. Whether that is a warning or an opportunity depends on growth outlook and other fundamentals shown elsewhere on Stockcircle.

Information Strategy & Technology , Ltd.'s ROE moves when the underlying profit, equity, or asset base changes. Cost cuts, pricing power, buybacks, write-downs, and cyclical swings can all shift the percentage. The latest reading is 21.13%; use YoY and peer views to separate noise from signal.

Context for 155A.T's ROE usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers (average 40.55%), and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Information Strategy & Technology , Ltd.'s other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Information Strategy & Technology , Ltd. against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in ROE easier to interpret. Start with 21.13% here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.