BackWatts Water Technologies Overview
Watts Water Technologies, Inc. - Ordinary Shares - Class A

Watts Water Technologies PEG Ratio

Watts Water Technologies (WTS) has a PEG ratio of 35.11, above the Industrials sector average of 16.74.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

PEG Ratio

35.11

PEG Ratio

35.11

The PEG ratio measures a stock's valuation relative to its earnings growth rate. A PEG ratio below 1.0 may indicate that the stock is undervalued relative to its growth potential.

PEG Ratio (Comparison Companies)

Loading

PEG Ratio History

Loading

PEG Ratio Comparison

Loading

Watts Water Technologies (WTS) FAQ

Watts Water Technologies posts a PEG ratio of 35.11. That is above the Industrials sector average of 16.74. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

For Industrials stocks, a PEG ratio near 16.74 is typical. Watts Water Technologies's 35.11 is higher that level. That is roughly 109.8% above the sector mean. Whether that is a warning or an opportunity depends on growth outlook and other fundamentals shown elsewhere on Stockcircle.

Watts Water Technologies's PEG ratio of 35.11 comes from dividing a price-based measure by a related financial statistic. Changes can come from the stock price moving, the underlying fundamental shifting, or both. Track both the level and the trend — a rising multiple on falling fundamentals is a different story than a rising multiple on rising earnings.

Context for WTS's PEG ratio usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers (average 16.74), and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Watts Water Technologies's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Watts Water Technologies against Industrials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Industrials are more comparable, which makes gaps in PEG ratio easier to interpret. Start with 35.11 here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.