BackVertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated Overview
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated

Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated P/E Ratio

Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (VX1.DE) has a P/E ratio of 32.27, below the Healthcare sector average of 70.94.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

P/E Ratio

32.27

P/E Ratio

32.27

The P/E ratio compares a company's stock price to its earnings per share. A lower P/E ratio may indicate that the stock is undervalued.

P/E Ratio (Comparison Companies)

Loading

P/E Ratio History

Loading

P/E Ratio Comparison

Loading

Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (VX1.DE) FAQ

Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated posts a P/E ratio of 32.27. That is below the Healthcare sector average of 70.94. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

For Healthcare stocks, a P/E ratio near 70.94 is typical. Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated's 32.27 is lower that level. That is roughly 54.5% below the sector mean. Whether that is a warning or an opportunity depends on growth outlook and other fundamentals shown elsewhere on Stockcircle.

Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated's P/E ratio of 32.27 comes from dividing a price-based measure by a related financial statistic. Changes can come from the stock price moving, the underlying fundamental shifting, or both. Track both the level and the trend — a rising multiple on falling fundamentals is a different story than a rising multiple on rising earnings.

Context for VX1.DE's P/E ratio usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers (average 70.94), and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated against Healthcare peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Healthcare are more comparable, which makes gaps in P/E ratio easier to interpret. Start with 32.27 here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.