BackUnited Security Bancshares (CA) Overview
United Security Bancshares (CA)

United Security Bancshares (CA) PEG Ratio

Valuation check: UBFO's PEG ratio is 39.63, above the Finance sector average of 17.35.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

PEG Ratio

39.63

PEG Ratio

39.63

The PEG ratio measures a stock's valuation relative to its earnings growth rate. A PEG ratio below 1.0 may indicate that the stock is undervalued relative to its growth potential.

PEG Ratio (Comparison Companies)

Loading

PEG Ratio History

Loading

PEG Ratio Comparison

Loading

United Security Bancshares (CA) (UBFO) FAQ

United Security Bancshares (CA) posts a PEG ratio of 39.63. That is above the Finance sector average of 17.35. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

For Finance stocks, a PEG ratio near 17.35 is typical. United Security Bancshares (CA)'s 39.63 is higher that level. That is roughly 128.5% above the sector mean. Whether that is a warning or an opportunity depends on growth outlook and other fundamentals shown elsewhere on Stockcircle.

United Security Bancshares (CA)'s PEG ratio of 39.63 comes from dividing a price-based measure by a related financial statistic. Changes can come from the stock price moving, the underlying fundamental shifting, or both. Track both the level and the trend — a rising multiple on falling fundamentals is a different story than a rising multiple on rising earnings.

Context for UBFO's PEG ratio usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers (average 17.35), and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; United Security Bancshares (CA)'s other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging United Security Bancshares (CA) against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in PEG ratio easier to interpret. Start with 39.63 here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.