BackSonida Senior Living Overview

Sonida Senior Living Common Stock

Track Sonida Senior Living's common stock ($470K) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Common Stock
$474000.00
↑ 150.79% YoYΔ $285000.00 vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Sonida Senior Living Common Stock History

Loading

Sonida Senior Living vs. peers: Common Stock Comparison

Loading

Sonida Senior Living Common Stock Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company). Positive growth indicates new issuance/dilution; negative growth indicates reductions/buybacks.

Loading

Sonida Senior Living (SNDA) FAQ

Sonida Senior Living posts a common stock of $470K as of June 2026. That compares with $190K in the prior-year period — up 150.8% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Sonida Senior Living's common stock was $190K. The latest reading is $470K — a 150.8% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Common Stock is one piece of Sonida Senior Living's financial statement story. At $470K, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for SNDA's common stock usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Sonida Senior Living's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Sonida Senior Living against Healthcare peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Healthcare are more comparable, which makes gaps in common stock easier to interpret. Start with $470K here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.