BackSun Country Airlines Holdings Overview
Sun Country Airlines Holdings Inc

Sun Country Airlines Holdings P/E Ratio

Latest P/E ratio for Sun Country Airlines Holdings: 21.58 — see history and peer comparisons.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

P/E Ratio

21.58

P/E Ratio

21.58

The P/E ratio compares a company's stock price to its earnings per share. A lower P/E ratio may indicate that the stock is undervalued.

P/E Ratio (Comparison Companies)

Loading

P/E Ratio History

Loading

P/E Ratio Comparison

Loading

Sun Country Airlines Holdings (SNCY) FAQ

Sun Country Airlines Holdings posts a P/E ratio of 21.58. That is below the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 49.4. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

For Consumer Discretionary stocks, a P/E ratio near 49.4 is typical. Sun Country Airlines Holdings's 21.58 is lower that level. That is roughly 56.3% below the sector mean. Whether that is a warning or an opportunity depends on growth outlook and other fundamentals shown elsewhere on Stockcircle.

Sun Country Airlines Holdings's P/E ratio of 21.58 comes from dividing a price-based measure by a related financial statistic. Changes can come from the stock price moving, the underlying fundamental shifting, or both. Track both the level and the trend — a rising multiple on falling fundamentals is a different story than a rising multiple on rising earnings.

Context for SNCY's P/E ratio usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers (average 49.4), and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Sun Country Airlines Holdings's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Sun Country Airlines Holdings against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in P/E ratio easier to interpret. Start with 21.58 here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.