BackScientific Games Overview
Scientific Games Corporation

Scientific Games Debt to Equity

Latest debt-to-equity ratio for Scientific Games: 17.22 — see history and peer comparisons.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

Debt to Equity

17.22

Debt to Equity

17.22

Debt-to-Equity ratio measures a company's financial leverage by comparing its total debt to shareholder equity. A lower D/E ratio generally indicates a more financially stable company with less risk.

Debt to Equity (Comparison Companies)

Loading

Debt to Equity History

Loading

Debt to Equity Comparison

Loading

Scientific Games (SGMS) FAQ

Scientific Games's debt-to-equity ratio stands at 17.22. That is above the Technology sector average of 0.4. Stockcircle updates this page with the newest filings so you can track how the metric evolves quarter by quarter.

Scientific Games sits higher the Technology benchmark (0.4) with a debt-to-equity ratio of 17.22. That is roughly 4180.2% above the sector mean. Peer context matters because what looks expensive or cheap in absolute terms can be normal for the sector.

Whether 17.22 is attractive depends on Scientific Games's earnings outlook, competitive position, and how peers are valued. Investors typically ask: is growth accelerating, are margins stable, and is the multiple expanding or compressing over time? The history and comparison charts below are built for those checks.

The history chart shows how Scientific Games's debt-to-equity ratio evolved across reporting periods, while the comparison chart places SGMS next to similar companies. Use both: a rising metric that still lags peers tells a different story than a rising metric that already leads the group. Growth charts, when available, highlight acceleration or slowdown.

Yes — within Technology, debt-to-equity ratio is commonly used to spot outliers. Scientific Games's reading of 17.22 (sector avg 0.4) is a starting point; confirm whether differences come from growth, margins, accounting choices, or one-time items before treating an outlier as a buy or sell signal.