Latest debt-to-equity ratio for Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory: 2.19 — see history and peer comparisons.
Get informed when a big investor buys or sells
+ Follow2.19
Debt-to-Equity ratio measures a company's financial leverage by comparing its total debt to shareholder equity. A lower D/E ratio generally indicates a more financially stable company with less risk.
Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory (RMCF) currently reports a debt-to-equity ratio of 2.19. That is above the Consumer Staples sector average of -0.91. Use the charts on this page to explore Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory's debt-to-equity ratio history and peer comparisons.
Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory's debt-to-equity ratio of 2.19 is higher than the Consumer Staples sector average of -0.91. That is roughly 340.4% above the sector mean. A reading higher peers can reflect different growth expectations, capital structure, or profitability — so it is worth checking the peer comparison chart before drawing conclusions.
The debt-to-equity ratio is a valuation multiple that relates Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory's market price to a fundamental measure such as earnings, sales, or book value. At 2.19, RMCF can look expensive or cheap only in context — versus its own history, growth rate, and Consumer Staples peers. Higher multiples often price in stronger expected growth; lower ones can signal value or concern.
Start with the current debt-to-equity ratio of 2.19, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. The Consumer Staples average is -0.91. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, and consider following RMCF for alerts when major investors trade the stock.
Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory is classified in the Consumer Staples sector. On debt-to-equity ratio, it currently shows 2.19 versus a sector average near -0.91. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Consumer Staples are usually more informative than comparing RMCF with unrelated industries.