BackRalph Lauren Overview
Ralph Lauren Corp - Ordinary Shares - Class A

Ralph Lauren PEG Ratio

Latest PEG ratio for Ralph Lauren: 122.1 — see history and peer comparisons.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

PEG Ratio

122.10

PEG Ratio

122.10

The PEG ratio measures a stock's valuation relative to its earnings growth rate. A PEG ratio below 1.0 may indicate that the stock is undervalued relative to its growth potential.

PEG Ratio (Comparison Companies)

Loading

PEG Ratio History

Loading

PEG Ratio Comparison

Loading

Ralph Lauren (RL) FAQ

Ralph Lauren (RL) currently reports a PEG ratio of 122.1. That is above the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 4.97. Use the charts on this page to explore Ralph Lauren's PEG ratio history and peer comparisons.

Ralph Lauren's PEG ratio of 122.1 is higher than the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 4.97. That is roughly 2358.0% above the sector mean. A reading higher peers can reflect different growth expectations, capital structure, or profitability — so it is worth checking the peer comparison chart before drawing conclusions.

The PEG ratio is a valuation multiple that relates Ralph Lauren's market price to a fundamental measure such as earnings, sales, or book value. At 122.1, RL can look expensive or cheap only in context — versus its own history, growth rate, and Consumer Discretionary peers. Higher multiples often price in stronger expected growth; lower ones can signal value or concern.

Start with the current PEG ratio of 122.1, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. The Consumer Discretionary average is 4.97. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for Ralph Lauren, and consider following RL for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

Ralph Lauren is classified in the Consumer Discretionary sector. On PEG ratio, it currently shows 122.1 versus a sector average near 4.97. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Consumer Discretionary are usually more informative than comparing RL with unrelated industries.