BackAlpine Income Property Trust Overview
Alpine Income Property Trust Inc

Alpine Income Property Trust Price to Book Ratio

Alpine Income Property Trust (PINE) has a P/B ratio of 0.83, below the Real Estate sector average of 2.27.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

Price to Book

0.83

Price to Book Ratio

0.83

The Price-to-Book ratio compares a company's market value to its book value. A lower P/B ratio may suggest that the stock is undervalued relative to its assets.

Price to Book (Comparison Companies)

Loading

Price to Book Ratio History

Loading

Price to Book Ratio Comparison

Loading

Alpine Income Property Trust (PINE) FAQ

Alpine Income Property Trust posts a P/B ratio of 0.83. That is below the Real Estate sector average of 2.27. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

For Real Estate stocks, a P/B ratio near 2.27 is typical. Alpine Income Property Trust's 0.83 is lower that level. That is roughly 63.3% below the sector mean. Whether that is a warning or an opportunity depends on growth outlook and other fundamentals shown elsewhere on Stockcircle.

Alpine Income Property Trust's P/B ratio of 0.83 comes from dividing a price-based measure by a related financial statistic. Changes can come from the stock price moving, the underlying fundamental shifting, or both. Track both the level and the trend — a rising multiple on falling fundamentals is a different story than a rising multiple on rising earnings.

Context for PINE's P/B ratio usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers (average 2.27), and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Alpine Income Property Trust's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Alpine Income Property Trust against Real Estate peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Real Estate are more comparable, which makes gaps in P/B ratio easier to interpret. Start with 0.83 here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.