BackPacific Biosciences of California Overview
Pacific Biosciences of California Inc

Pacific Biosciences of California PEG Ratio

Valuation check: PACB's PEG ratio is -46.83, below the Healthcare sector average of 2.89.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

PEG Ratio

-46.83

PEG Ratio

-46.83

The PEG ratio measures a stock's valuation relative to its earnings growth rate. A PEG ratio below 1.0 may indicate that the stock is undervalued relative to its growth potential.

PEG Ratio (Comparison Companies)

Loading

PEG Ratio History

Loading

PEG Ratio Comparison

Loading

Pacific Biosciences of California (PACB) FAQ

Pacific Biosciences of California posts a PEG ratio of -46.83. That is below the Healthcare sector average of 2.89. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

For Healthcare stocks, a PEG ratio near 2.89 is typical. Pacific Biosciences of California's -46.83 is lower that level. That is roughly 1720.0% below the sector mean. Whether that is a warning or an opportunity depends on growth outlook and other fundamentals shown elsewhere on Stockcircle.

Pacific Biosciences of California's PEG ratio of -46.83 comes from dividing a price-based measure by a related financial statistic. Changes can come from the stock price moving, the underlying fundamental shifting, or both. Track both the level and the trend — a rising multiple on falling fundamentals is a different story than a rising multiple on rising earnings.

Context for PACB's PEG ratio usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers (average 2.89), and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Pacific Biosciences of California's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Pacific Biosciences of California against Healthcare peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Healthcare are more comparable, which makes gaps in PEG ratio easier to interpret. Start with -46.83 here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.