BackArcelorMittal - New York Shares - Level III Overview
ArcelorMittal - New York Shares - Level III

ArcelorMittal - New York Shares - Level III PEG Ratio

ArcelorMittal - New York Shares - Level III (MT) has a PEG ratio of -78.84, below the Materials sector average of 10.15.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

PEG Ratio

-78.84

PEG Ratio

-78.84

The PEG ratio measures a stock's valuation relative to its earnings growth rate. A PEG ratio below 1.0 may indicate that the stock is undervalued relative to its growth potential.

Average PEG Ratio (Comparison Companies)

Loading

PEG Ratio History

Loading

PEG Ratio Comparison

Loading

ArcelorMittal - New York Shares - Level III (MT) FAQ

ArcelorMittal - New York Shares - Level III posts a PEG ratio of -78.84. That is below the Materials sector average of 10.15. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

For Materials stocks, a PEG ratio near 10.15 is typical. ArcelorMittal - New York Shares - Level III's -78.84 is lower that level. That is roughly 876.8% below the sector mean. Whether that is a warning or an opportunity depends on growth outlook and other fundamentals shown elsewhere on Stockcircle.

ArcelorMittal - New York Shares - Level III's PEG ratio of -78.84 comes from dividing a price-based measure by a related financial statistic. Changes can come from the stock price moving, the underlying fundamental shifting, or both. Track both the level and the trend — a rising multiple on falling fundamentals is a different story than a rising multiple on rising earnings.

Context for MT's PEG ratio usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers (average 10.15), and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; ArcelorMittal - New York Shares - Level III's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging ArcelorMittal - New York Shares - Level III against Materials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Materials are more comparable, which makes gaps in PEG ratio easier to interpret. Start with -78.84 here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.