BackMonadelphous Group Limited Overview
Monadelphous Group Limited

Monadelphous Group Limited PEG Ratio

Monadelphous Group Limited (MND.AX) has a PEG ratio of 45.27, above the Industrials sector average of 16.26.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

PEG Ratio

45.27

PEG Ratio

45.27

The PEG ratio measures a stock's valuation relative to its earnings growth rate. A PEG ratio below 1.0 may indicate that the stock is undervalued relative to its growth potential.

PEG Ratio (Comparison Companies)

Loading

PEG Ratio History

Loading

PEG Ratio Comparison

Loading

Monadelphous Group Limited (MND.AX) FAQ

Monadelphous Group Limited posts a PEG ratio of 45.27. That is above the Industrials sector average of 16.26. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

For Industrials stocks, a PEG ratio near 16.26 is typical. Monadelphous Group Limited's 45.27 is higher that level. That is roughly 178.4% above the sector mean. Whether that is a warning or an opportunity depends on growth outlook and other fundamentals shown elsewhere on Stockcircle.

Monadelphous Group Limited's PEG ratio of 45.27 comes from dividing a price-based measure by a related financial statistic. Changes can come from the stock price moving, the underlying fundamental shifting, or both. Track both the level and the trend — a rising multiple on falling fundamentals is a different story than a rising multiple on rising earnings.

Context for MND.AX's PEG ratio usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers (average 16.26), and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Monadelphous Group Limited's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Monadelphous Group Limited against Industrials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Industrials are more comparable, which makes gaps in PEG ratio easier to interpret. Start with 45.27 here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.