BackPediatrix Medical Group Overview
Pediatrix Medical Group Inc

Pediatrix Medical Group Debt to Equity

Valuation check: MD's debt-to-equity ratio is 0.7, above the Healthcare sector average of 0.3.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

Debt to Equity

0.70

Debt to Equity

0.70

Debt-to-Equity ratio measures a company's financial leverage by comparing its total debt to shareholder equity. A lower D/E ratio generally indicates a more financially stable company with less risk.

Debt to Equity (Comparison Companies)

Loading

Debt to Equity History

Loading

Debt to Equity Comparison

Loading

Pediatrix Medical Group (MD) FAQ

Pediatrix Medical Group posts a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.7. That is above the Healthcare sector average of 0.3. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

For Healthcare stocks, a debt-to-equity ratio near 0.3 is typical. Pediatrix Medical Group's 0.7 is higher that level. That is roughly 134.5% above the sector mean. Whether that is a warning or an opportunity depends on growth outlook and other fundamentals shown elsewhere on Stockcircle.

Pediatrix Medical Group's debt-to-equity ratio of 0.7 comes from dividing a price-based measure by a related financial statistic. Changes can come from the stock price moving, the underlying fundamental shifting, or both. Track both the level and the trend — a rising multiple on falling fundamentals is a different story than a rising multiple on rising earnings.

Context for MD's debt-to-equity ratio usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers (average 0.3), and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Pediatrix Medical Group's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Pediatrix Medical Group against Healthcare peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Healthcare are more comparable, which makes gaps in debt-to-equity ratio easier to interpret. Start with 0.7 here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.