BackLiveOne- 9% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A Overview
LiveOne Inc - 9% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A

LiveOne- 9% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A Return on Equity

Latest ROE for LiveOne- 9% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A: 172.04% — see history and peer comparisons.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

ROE

172.04%

Return on Equity

172.04%

Return on Equity measures how efficiently a company uses shareholders' equity to generate profits. A higher ROE indicates better profitability relative to equity.

ROE (Comparison Companies)

Loading

ROE History

Loading

ROE Comparison

Loading

LiveOne- 9% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A (LVOPP) FAQ

LiveOne- 9% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A posts a ROE of 172.04%. That is above the Technology sector average of 47.61%. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

For Technology stocks, a ROE near 47.61% is typical. LiveOne- 9% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A's 172.04% is higher that level. That is roughly 261.4% above the sector mean. Whether that is a warning or an opportunity depends on growth outlook and other fundamentals shown elsewhere on Stockcircle.

LiveOne- 9% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A's ROE moves when the underlying profit, equity, or asset base changes. Cost cuts, pricing power, buybacks, write-downs, and cyclical swings can all shift the percentage. The latest reading is 172.04%; use YoY and peer views to separate noise from signal.

Context for LVOPP's ROE usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers (average 47.61%), and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; LiveOne- 9% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging LiveOne- 9% PRF PERPETUAL USD 25 - Ser A against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in ROE easier to interpret. Start with 172.04% here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.