BackLowe`s Cos. Overview
Lowe`s Cos., Inc.

Lowe`s Cos. PEG Ratio

Valuation check: LOW's PEG ratio is 38973.58, above the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 6.41.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

PEG Ratio

38973.58

PEG Ratio

38973.58

The PEG ratio measures a stock's valuation relative to its earnings growth rate. A PEG ratio below 1.0 may indicate that the stock is undervalued relative to its growth potential.

PEG Ratio (Comparison Companies)

Loading

PEG Ratio History

Loading

PEG Ratio Comparison

Loading

Lowe`s Cos. (LOW) FAQ

Lowe`s Cos. (LOW) currently reports a PEG ratio of 38973.58. That is above the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 6.41. Use the charts on this page to explore Lowe`s Cos.'s PEG ratio history and peer comparisons.

Lowe`s Cos.'s PEG ratio of 38973.58 is higher than the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 6.41. That is roughly 607685.4% above the sector mean. A reading higher peers can reflect different growth expectations, capital structure, or profitability — so it is worth checking the peer comparison chart before drawing conclusions.

The PEG ratio is a valuation multiple that relates Lowe`s Cos.'s market price to a fundamental measure such as earnings, sales, or book value. At 38973.58, LOW can look expensive or cheap only in context — versus its own history, growth rate, and Consumer Discretionary peers. Higher multiples often price in stronger expected growth; lower ones can signal value or concern.

Start with the current PEG ratio of 38973.58, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. The Consumer Discretionary average is 6.41. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for Lowe`s Cos., and consider following LOW for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

Lowe`s Cos. is classified in the Consumer Discretionary sector. On PEG ratio, it currently shows 38973.58 versus a sector average near 6.41. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Consumer Discretionary are usually more informative than comparing LOW with unrelated industries.