BackLeggett & Platt Overview
Leggett & Platt, Inc.

Leggett & Platt PEG Ratio

Latest PEG ratio for Leggett & Platt: -56.61 — see history and peer comparisons.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

PEG Ratio

-56.61

PEG Ratio

-56.61

The PEG ratio measures a stock's valuation relative to its earnings growth rate. A PEG ratio below 1.0 may indicate that the stock is undervalued relative to its growth potential.

PEG Ratio (Comparison Companies)

Loading

PEG Ratio History

Loading

PEG Ratio Comparison

Loading

Leggett & Platt (LEG) FAQ

Leggett & Platt (LEG) currently reports a PEG ratio of -56.61. That is below the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 9.86. Use the charts on this page to explore Leggett & Platt's PEG ratio history and peer comparisons.

Leggett & Platt's PEG ratio of -56.61 is lower than the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 9.86. That is roughly 673.9% below the sector mean. A reading lower peers can reflect different growth expectations, capital structure, or profitability — so it is worth checking the peer comparison chart before drawing conclusions.

The PEG ratio is a valuation multiple that relates Leggett & Platt's market price to a fundamental measure such as earnings, sales, or book value. At -56.61, LEG can look expensive or cheap only in context — versus its own history, growth rate, and Consumer Discretionary peers. Higher multiples often price in stronger expected growth; lower ones can signal value or concern.

Start with the current PEG ratio of -56.61, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. The Consumer Discretionary average is 9.86. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for Leggett & Platt, and consider following LEG for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

Leggett & Platt is classified in the Consumer Discretionary sector. On PEG ratio, it currently shows -56.61 versus a sector average near 9.86. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Consumer Discretionary are usually more informative than comparing LEG with unrelated industries.