BackKansai Electric Power Company Incorporated Overview
Kansai Electric Power Company Incorporated - ADR

Kansai Electric Power Company Incorporated Return on Equity

Latest ROE for Kansai Electric Power Company Incorporated: 8.17% — see history and peer comparisons.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

ROE

8.17%

Return on Equity

8.17%

Return on Equity measures how efficiently a company uses shareholders' equity to generate profits. A higher ROE indicates better profitability relative to equity.

ROE (Comparison Companies)

Loading

ROE History

Loading

ROE Comparison

Loading

Kansai Electric Power Company Incorporated (KAEPY) FAQ

Kansai Electric Power Company Incorporated posts a ROE of 8.17%. That is below the Utilities sector average of 11.25%. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

For Utilities stocks, a ROE near 11.25% is typical. Kansai Electric Power Company Incorporated's 8.17% is lower that level. That is roughly 27.4% below the sector mean. Whether that is a warning or an opportunity depends on growth outlook and other fundamentals shown elsewhere on Stockcircle.

Kansai Electric Power Company Incorporated's ROE moves when the underlying profit, equity, or asset base changes. Cost cuts, pricing power, buybacks, write-downs, and cyclical swings can all shift the percentage. The latest reading is 8.17%; use YoY and peer views to separate noise from signal.

Context for KAEPY's ROE usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers (average 11.25%), and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Kansai Electric Power Company Incorporated's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Kansai Electric Power Company Incorporated against Utilities peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Utilities are more comparable, which makes gaps in ROE easier to interpret. Start with 8.17% here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.