BackIncome Opportunity Realty Investors Overview
Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc.

Income Opportunity Realty Investors P/E Ratio

Valuation check: IOR's P/E ratio is 18.68, above the Finance sector average of 15.93.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

P/E Ratio

18.68

P/E Ratio

18.68

The P/E ratio compares a company's stock price to its earnings per share. A lower P/E ratio may indicate that the stock is undervalued.

P/E Ratio (Comparison Companies)

Loading

P/E Ratio History

Loading

P/E Ratio Comparison

Loading

Income Opportunity Realty Investors (IOR) FAQ

Income Opportunity Realty Investors posts a P/E ratio of 18.68. That is above the Finance sector average of 15.93. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

For Finance stocks, a P/E ratio near 15.93 is typical. Income Opportunity Realty Investors's 18.68 is higher that level. That is roughly 17.2% above the sector mean. Whether that is a warning or an opportunity depends on growth outlook and other fundamentals shown elsewhere on Stockcircle.

Income Opportunity Realty Investors's P/E ratio of 18.68 comes from dividing a price-based measure by a related financial statistic. Changes can come from the stock price moving, the underlying fundamental shifting, or both. Track both the level and the trend — a rising multiple on falling fundamentals is a different story than a rising multiple on rising earnings.

Context for IOR's P/E ratio usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers (average 15.93), and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Income Opportunity Realty Investors's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Income Opportunity Realty Investors against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in P/E ratio easier to interpret. Start with 18.68 here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.