BackiMedia Brands- 8.50% NT REDEEM 30/09/2026 USD 25 Overview
iMedia Brands Inc - 8.50% NT REDEEM 30/09/2026 USD 25

iMedia Brands- 8.50% NT REDEEM 30/09/2026 USD 25 Return on Equity

Valuation check: IMBIL's ROE is -410.99%, below the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 23.04%.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

ROE

-410.99%

Return on Equity

-410.99%

Return on Equity measures how efficiently a company uses shareholders' equity to generate profits. A higher ROE indicates better profitability relative to equity.

ROE (Comparison Companies)

Loading

ROE History

Loading

ROE Comparison

Loading

iMedia Brands- 8.50% NT REDEEM 30/09/2026 USD 25 (IMBIL) FAQ

iMedia Brands- 8.50% NT REDEEM 30/09/2026 USD 25 posts a ROE of -410.99%. That is below the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 23.04%. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

For Consumer Discretionary stocks, a ROE near 23.04% is typical. iMedia Brands- 8.50% NT REDEEM 30/09/2026 USD 25's -410.99% is lower that level. That is roughly 1883.7% below the sector mean. Whether that is a warning or an opportunity depends on growth outlook and other fundamentals shown elsewhere on Stockcircle.

iMedia Brands- 8.50% NT REDEEM 30/09/2026 USD 25's ROE moves when the underlying profit, equity, or asset base changes. Cost cuts, pricing power, buybacks, write-downs, and cyclical swings can all shift the percentage. The latest reading is -410.99%; use YoY and peer views to separate noise from signal.

Context for IMBIL's ROE usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers (average 23.04%), and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; iMedia Brands- 8.50% NT REDEEM 30/09/2026 USD 25's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging iMedia Brands- 8.50% NT REDEEM 30/09/2026 USD 25 against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in ROE easier to interpret. Start with -410.99% here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.