BackHaverty Furniture Companies Overview
Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc.

Haverty Furniture Companies Return on Equity

Latest ROE for Haverty Furniture Companies: 2.51% — see history and peer comparisons.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

ROE

2.51%

Return on Equity

2.51%

Return on Equity measures how efficiently a company uses shareholders' equity to generate profits. A higher ROE indicates better profitability relative to equity.

ROE (Comparison Companies)

Loading

ROE History

Loading

ROE Comparison

Loading

Haverty Furniture Companies (HVT-A) FAQ

Haverty Furniture Companies (HVT-A) currently reports a ROE of 2.51%. That is below the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 22.55%. Use the charts on this page to explore Haverty Furniture Companies's ROE history and peer comparisons.

Haverty Furniture Companies's ROE of 2.51% is lower than the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 22.55%. That is roughly 88.9% below the sector mean. A reading lower peers can reflect different growth expectations, capital structure, or profitability — so it is worth checking the peer comparison chart before drawing conclusions.

There is no universal 'good' ROE, but Haverty Furniture Companies's current 2.51% should be judged against Consumer Discretionary norms (sector average: 22.55%) and against HVT-A's own history. Strong, stable readings often indicate durable competitive advantage; volatile or declining ones deserve a closer look at margins and capital efficiency.

Start with the current ROE of 2.51%, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. The Consumer Discretionary average is 22.55%. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for Haverty Furniture Companies, and consider following HVT-A for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

Haverty Furniture Companies is classified in the Consumer Discretionary sector. On ROE, it currently shows 2.51% versus a sector average near 22.55%. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Consumer Discretionary are usually more informative than comparing HVT-A with unrelated industries.