BackHaverty Furniture Companies Overview
Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc.

Haverty Furniture Companies P/E Ratio

Latest P/E ratio for Haverty Furniture Companies: 36.97 — see history and peer comparisons.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

P/E Ratio

36.97

P/E Ratio

36.97

The P/E ratio compares a company's stock price to its earnings per share. A lower P/E ratio may indicate that the stock is undervalued.

P/E Ratio (Comparison Companies)

Loading

P/E Ratio History

Loading

P/E Ratio Comparison

Loading

Haverty Furniture Companies (HVT-A) FAQ

Haverty Furniture Companies posts a P/E ratio of 36.97. That is below the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 51.44. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

For Consumer Discretionary stocks, a P/E ratio near 51.44 is typical. Haverty Furniture Companies's 36.97 is lower that level. That is roughly 28.1% below the sector mean. Whether that is a warning or an opportunity depends on growth outlook and other fundamentals shown elsewhere on Stockcircle.

Haverty Furniture Companies's P/E ratio of 36.97 comes from dividing a price-based measure by a related financial statistic. Changes can come from the stock price moving, the underlying fundamental shifting, or both. Track both the level and the trend — a rising multiple on falling fundamentals is a different story than a rising multiple on rising earnings.

Context for HVT-A's P/E ratio usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers (average 51.44), and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Haverty Furniture Companies's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Haverty Furniture Companies against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in P/E ratio easier to interpret. Start with 36.97 here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.