BackHeska (Restricted Voting) Overview

Heska (Restricted Voting) Accounts Payable

Track Heska (Restricted Voting)'s accounts payable ($12M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Accounts Payable
$12.25M
1.04% YoYΔ $-129000.00 vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Heska (Restricted Voting) Accounts Payable History

Loading

Heska (Restricted Voting) vs. peers: Accounts Payable Comparison

Loading

Heska (Restricted Voting) Accounts Payable Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Heska (Restricted Voting) (HSKA) FAQ

Heska (Restricted Voting) posts a accounts payable of $12M as of March 2023. That compares with $12M in the prior-year period — down 1.0% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Heska (Restricted Voting)'s accounts payable was $12M. The latest reading is $12M — a 1.0% year-over-year decrease (period ending March 2023). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Accounts Payable is one piece of Heska (Restricted Voting)'s financial statement story. At $12M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for HSKA's accounts payable usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Heska (Restricted Voting)'s other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Heska (Restricted Voting) against Healthcare peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Healthcare are more comparable, which makes gaps in accounts payable easier to interpret. Start with $12M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.