BackGildan Activewear Overview
Gildan Activewear Inc

Gildan Activewear P/E Ratio

Latest P/E ratio for Gildan Activewear: 104.02 — see history and peer comparisons.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

P/E Ratio

104.02

P/E Ratio

104.02

The P/E ratio compares a company's stock price to its earnings per share. A lower P/E ratio may indicate that the stock is undervalued.

P/E Ratio (Comparison Companies)

Loading

P/E Ratio History

Loading

P/E Ratio Comparison

Loading

Gildan Activewear (GIL) FAQ

Gildan Activewear (GIL) currently reports a P/E ratio of 104.02. That is above the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 21.97. Use the charts on this page to explore Gildan Activewear's P/E ratio history and peer comparisons.

Gildan Activewear's P/E ratio of 104.02 is higher than the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 21.97. That is roughly 373.5% above the sector mean. A reading higher peers can reflect different growth expectations, capital structure, or profitability — so it is worth checking the peer comparison chart before drawing conclusions.

The P/E ratio is a valuation multiple that relates Gildan Activewear's market price to a fundamental measure such as earnings, sales, or book value. At 104.02, GIL can look expensive or cheap only in context — versus its own history, growth rate, and Consumer Discretionary peers. Higher multiples often price in stronger expected growth; lower ones can signal value or concern.

Start with the current P/E ratio of 104.02, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. The Consumer Discretionary average is 21.97. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for Gildan Activewear, and consider following GIL for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

Gildan Activewear is classified in the Consumer Discretionary sector. On P/E ratio, it currently shows 104.02 versus a sector average near 21.97. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Consumer Discretionary are usually more informative than comparing GIL with unrelated industries.