BackFossil Group- 7% NT REDEEM 30/11/2026 USD 25 Overview
Fossil Group Inc - 7% NT REDEEM 30/11/2026 USD 25

Fossil Group- 7% NT REDEEM 30/11/2026 USD 25 Return on Equity

Latest ROE for Fossil Group- 7% NT REDEEM 30/11/2026 USD 25: -77.69% — see history and peer comparisons.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

ROE

-77.69%

Return on Equity

-77.69%

Return on Equity measures how efficiently a company uses shareholders' equity to generate profits. A higher ROE indicates better profitability relative to equity.

ROE (Comparison Companies)

Loading

ROE History

Loading

ROE Comparison

Loading

Fossil Group- 7% NT REDEEM 30/11/2026 USD 25 (FOSLL) FAQ

Fossil Group- 7% NT REDEEM 30/11/2026 USD 25 posts a ROE of -77.69%. That is below the Industrials sector average of 20.41%. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

For Industrials stocks, a ROE near 20.41% is typical. Fossil Group- 7% NT REDEEM 30/11/2026 USD 25's -77.69% is lower that level. That is roughly 480.7% below the sector mean. Whether that is a warning or an opportunity depends on growth outlook and other fundamentals shown elsewhere on Stockcircle.

Fossil Group- 7% NT REDEEM 30/11/2026 USD 25's ROE moves when the underlying profit, equity, or asset base changes. Cost cuts, pricing power, buybacks, write-downs, and cyclical swings can all shift the percentage. The latest reading is -77.69%; use YoY and peer views to separate noise from signal.

Context for FOSLL's ROE usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers (average 20.41%), and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Fossil Group- 7% NT REDEEM 30/11/2026 USD 25's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Fossil Group- 7% NT REDEEM 30/11/2026 USD 25 against Industrials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Industrials are more comparable, which makes gaps in ROE easier to interpret. Start with -77.69% here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.