Back1-800 Flowers.com Overview
1-800 Flowers.com Inc. - Ordinary Shares - Class A

1-800 Flowers.com Return on Equity

Valuation check: FLWS's ROE is -69.81%, below the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 23.04%.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

ROE

-69.81%

Return on Equity

-69.81%

Return on Equity measures how efficiently a company uses shareholders' equity to generate profits. A higher ROE indicates better profitability relative to equity.

ROE (Comparison Companies)

Loading

ROE History

Loading

ROE Comparison

Loading

1-800 Flowers.com (FLWS) FAQ

1-800 Flowers.com (FLWS) currently reports a ROE of -69.81%. That is below the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 23.04%. Use the charts on this page to explore 1-800 Flowers.com's ROE history and peer comparisons.

1-800 Flowers.com's ROE of -69.81% is lower than the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 23.04%. That is roughly 403.0% below the sector mean. A reading lower peers can reflect different growth expectations, capital structure, or profitability — so it is worth checking the peer comparison chart before drawing conclusions.

There is no universal 'good' ROE, but 1-800 Flowers.com's current -69.81% should be judged against Consumer Discretionary norms (sector average: 23.04%) and against FLWS's own history. Strong, stable readings often indicate durable competitive advantage; volatile or declining ones deserve a closer look at margins and capital efficiency.

Start with the current ROE of -69.81%, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. The Consumer Discretionary average is 23.04%. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for 1-800 Flowers.com, and consider following FLWS for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

1-800 Flowers.com is classified in the Consumer Discretionary sector. On ROE, it currently shows -69.81% versus a sector average near 23.04%. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Consumer Discretionary are usually more informative than comparing FLWS with unrelated industries.