BackEnerpac Tool Group Overview
Enerpac Tool Group Corp - Ordinary Shares - Class A

Enerpac Tool Group PEG Ratio

Enerpac Tool Group (EPAC) has a PEG ratio of 55.79, above the Industrials sector average of 6.4.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

PEG Ratio

55.79

PEG Ratio

55.79

The PEG ratio measures a stock's valuation relative to its earnings growth rate. A PEG ratio below 1.0 may indicate that the stock is undervalued relative to its growth potential.

PEG Ratio (Comparison Companies)

Loading

PEG Ratio History

Loading

PEG Ratio Comparison

Loading

Enerpac Tool Group (EPAC) FAQ

Enerpac Tool Group (EPAC) currently reports a PEG ratio of 55.79. That is above the Industrials sector average of 6.4. Use the charts on this page to explore Enerpac Tool Group's PEG ratio history and peer comparisons.

Enerpac Tool Group's PEG ratio of 55.79 is higher than the Industrials sector average of 6.4. That is roughly 772.0% above the sector mean. A reading higher peers can reflect different growth expectations, capital structure, or profitability — so it is worth checking the peer comparison chart before drawing conclusions.

The PEG ratio is a valuation multiple that relates Enerpac Tool Group's market price to a fundamental measure such as earnings, sales, or book value. At 55.79, EPAC can look expensive or cheap only in context — versus its own history, growth rate, and Industrials peers. Higher multiples often price in stronger expected growth; lower ones can signal value or concern.

Start with the current PEG ratio of 55.79, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. The Industrials average is 6.4. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for Enerpac Tool Group, and consider following EPAC for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

Enerpac Tool Group is classified in the Industrials sector. On PEG ratio, it currently shows 55.79 versus a sector average near 6.4. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Industrials are usually more informative than comparing EPAC with unrelated industries.