BackDelek Logistics Partners LP - Unit Overview
Delek Logistics Partners LP - Unit

Delek Logistics Partners LP - Unit P/E Ratio

Delek Logistics Partners LP - Unit (DKL) has a P/E ratio of 19.09, below the Energy sector average of 19.64.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

P/E Ratio

19.09

P/E Ratio

19.09

The P/E ratio compares a company's stock price to its earnings per share. A lower P/E ratio may indicate that the stock is undervalued.

P/E Ratio (Comparison Companies)

Loading

P/E Ratio History

Loading

P/E Ratio Comparison

Loading

Delek Logistics Partners LP - Unit (DKL) FAQ

Delek Logistics Partners LP - Unit posts a P/E ratio of 19.09. That is below the Energy sector average of 19.64. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

For Energy stocks, a P/E ratio near 19.64 is typical. Delek Logistics Partners LP - Unit's 19.09 is lower that level. That is roughly 2.8% below the sector mean. Whether that is a warning or an opportunity depends on growth outlook and other fundamentals shown elsewhere on Stockcircle.

Delek Logistics Partners LP - Unit's P/E ratio of 19.09 comes from dividing a price-based measure by a related financial statistic. Changes can come from the stock price moving, the underlying fundamental shifting, or both. Track both the level and the trend — a rising multiple on falling fundamentals is a different story than a rising multiple on rising earnings.

Context for DKL's P/E ratio usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers (average 19.64), and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Delek Logistics Partners LP - Unit's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Delek Logistics Partners LP - Unit against Energy peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Energy are more comparable, which makes gaps in P/E ratio easier to interpret. Start with 19.09 here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.