Digital Brands Group- Warrants (01/05/2026) (DBGIW) has a debt-to-equity ratio of 21.46, above the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 0.84.
Get informed when a big investor buys or sells
+ Follow21.46
Debt-to-Equity ratio measures a company's financial leverage by comparing its total debt to shareholder equity. A lower D/E ratio generally indicates a more financially stable company with less risk.
Digital Brands Group- Warrants (01/05/2026) (DBGIW) currently reports a debt-to-equity ratio of 21.46. That is above the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 0.84. Use the charts on this page to explore Digital Brands Group- Warrants (01/05/2026)'s debt-to-equity ratio history and peer comparisons.
Digital Brands Group- Warrants (01/05/2026)'s debt-to-equity ratio of 21.46 is higher than the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 0.84. That is roughly 2448.3% above the sector mean. A reading higher peers can reflect different growth expectations, capital structure, or profitability — so it is worth checking the peer comparison chart before drawing conclusions.
The debt-to-equity ratio is a valuation multiple that relates Digital Brands Group- Warrants (01/05/2026)'s market price to a fundamental measure such as earnings, sales, or book value. At 21.46, DBGIW can look expensive or cheap only in context — versus its own history, growth rate, and Consumer Discretionary peers. Higher multiples often price in stronger expected growth; lower ones can signal value or concern.
Start with the current debt-to-equity ratio of 21.46, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. The Consumer Discretionary average is 0.84. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for Digital Brands Group- Warrants (01/05/2026), and consider following DBGIW for alerts when major investors trade the stock.
Digital Brands Group- Warrants (01/05/2026) is classified in the Consumer Discretionary sector. On debt-to-equity ratio, it currently shows 21.46 versus a sector average near 0.84. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Consumer Discretionary are usually more informative than comparing DBGIW with unrelated industries.