BackCaesars Entertainment Overview
Caesars Entertainment Inc

Caesars Entertainment PEG Ratio

Valuation check: CZR's PEG ratio is 85.46, above the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 22.41.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

PEG Ratio

85.46

PEG Ratio

85.46

The PEG ratio measures a stock's valuation relative to its earnings growth rate. A PEG ratio below 1.0 may indicate that the stock is undervalued relative to its growth potential.

Average PEG Ratio (Comparison Companies)

Loading

PEG Ratio History

Loading

PEG Ratio Comparison

Loading

Caesars Entertainment (CZR) FAQ

Caesars Entertainment posts a PEG ratio of 85.46. That is above the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 22.41. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

For Consumer Discretionary stocks, a PEG ratio near 22.41 is typical. Caesars Entertainment's 85.46 is higher that level. That is roughly 281.3% above the sector mean. Whether that is a warning or an opportunity depends on growth outlook and other fundamentals shown elsewhere on Stockcircle.

Caesars Entertainment's PEG ratio of 85.46 comes from dividing a price-based measure by a related financial statistic. Changes can come from the stock price moving, the underlying fundamental shifting, or both. Track both the level and the trend — a rising multiple on falling fundamentals is a different story than a rising multiple on rising earnings.

Context for CZR's PEG ratio usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers (average 22.41), and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Caesars Entertainment's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Caesars Entertainment against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in PEG ratio easier to interpret. Start with 85.46 here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.