BackCrimson Wine Group Overview
Crimson Wine Group Ltd

Crimson Wine Group Return on Equity

Crimson Wine Group (CWGL) has a ROE of 0.38%, below the Consumer Staples sector average of 13.77%.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

ROE

0.38%

Return on Equity

0.38%

Return on Equity measures how efficiently a company uses shareholders' equity to generate profits. A higher ROE indicates better profitability relative to equity.

ROE (Comparison Companies)

Loading

ROE History

Loading

ROE Comparison

Loading

Crimson Wine Group (CWGL) FAQ

Crimson Wine Group (CWGL) currently reports a ROE of 0.38%. That is below the Consumer Staples sector average of 13.77%. Use the charts on this page to explore Crimson Wine Group's ROE history and peer comparisons.

Crimson Wine Group's ROE of 0.38% is lower than the Consumer Staples sector average of 13.77%. That is roughly 97.2% below the sector mean. A reading lower peers can reflect different growth expectations, capital structure, or profitability — so it is worth checking the peer comparison chart before drawing conclusions.

There is no universal 'good' ROE, but Crimson Wine Group's current 0.38% should be judged against Consumer Staples norms (sector average: 13.77%) and against CWGL's own history. Strong, stable readings often indicate durable competitive advantage; volatile or declining ones deserve a closer look at margins and capital efficiency.

Start with the current ROE of 0.38%, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. The Consumer Staples average is 13.77%. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for Crimson Wine Group, and consider following CWGL for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

Crimson Wine Group is classified in the Consumer Staples sector. On ROE, it currently shows 0.38% versus a sector average near 13.77%. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Consumer Staples are usually more informative than comparing CWGL with unrelated industries.