BackCahya Mata Sarawak Berhad Overview
Cahya Mata Sarawak Berhad

Cahya Mata Sarawak Berhad P/E Ratio

Cahya Mata Sarawak Berhad (CHYMF) has a P/E ratio of 10.28, below the Materials sector average of 11.91.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

P/E Ratio

10.28

P/E Ratio

10.28

The P/E ratio compares a company's stock price to its earnings per share. A lower P/E ratio may indicate that the stock is undervalued.

P/E Ratio (Comparison Companies)

Loading

P/E Ratio History

Loading

P/E Ratio Comparison

Loading

Cahya Mata Sarawak Berhad (CHYMF) FAQ

Cahya Mata Sarawak Berhad (CHYMF) currently reports a P/E ratio of 10.28. That is below the Materials sector average of 11.91. Use the charts on this page to explore Cahya Mata Sarawak Berhad's P/E ratio history and peer comparisons.

Cahya Mata Sarawak Berhad's P/E ratio of 10.28 is lower than the Materials sector average of 11.91. That is roughly 13.7% below the sector mean. A reading lower peers can reflect different growth expectations, capital structure, or profitability — so it is worth checking the peer comparison chart before drawing conclusions.

The P/E ratio is a valuation multiple that relates Cahya Mata Sarawak Berhad's market price to a fundamental measure such as earnings, sales, or book value. At 10.28, CHYMF can look expensive or cheap only in context — versus its own history, growth rate, and Materials peers. Higher multiples often price in stronger expected growth; lower ones can signal value or concern.

Start with the current P/E ratio of 10.28, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. The Materials average is 11.91. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for Cahya Mata Sarawak Berhad, and consider following CHYMF for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

Cahya Mata Sarawak Berhad is classified in the Materials sector. On P/E ratio, it currently shows 10.28 versus a sector average near 11.91. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Materials are usually more informative than comparing CHYMF with unrelated industries.