BackCentennial Resource Development Overview
Centennial Resource Development Inc. - Class A

Centennial Resource Development Price to Book Ratio

Latest P/B ratio for Centennial Resource Development: 0.54 — see history and peer comparisons.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

Price to Book

0.54

Price to Book Ratio

0.54

The Price-to-Book ratio compares a company's market value to its book value. A lower P/B ratio may suggest that the stock is undervalued relative to its assets.

Price to Book (Comparison Companies)

Loading

Price to Book Ratio History

Loading

Price to Book Ratio Comparison

Loading

Centennial Resource Development (CDEV) FAQ

Centennial Resource Development posts a P/B ratio of 0.54. That is below the Energy sector average of 19.53. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

For Energy stocks, a P/B ratio near 19.53 is typical. Centennial Resource Development's 0.54 is lower that level. That is roughly 97.2% below the sector mean. Whether that is a warning or an opportunity depends on growth outlook and other fundamentals shown elsewhere on Stockcircle.

Centennial Resource Development's P/B ratio of 0.54 comes from dividing a price-based measure by a related financial statistic. Changes can come from the stock price moving, the underlying fundamental shifting, or both. Track both the level and the trend — a rising multiple on falling fundamentals is a different story than a rising multiple on rising earnings.

Context for CDEV's P/B ratio usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers (average 19.53), and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Centennial Resource Development's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Centennial Resource Development against Energy peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Energy are more comparable, which makes gaps in P/B ratio easier to interpret. Start with 0.54 here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.