BackBezeq The Israel Telecommunication Ltd. Overview
Bezeq The Israel Telecommunication Corp. Ltd.

Bezeq The Israel Telecommunication Ltd. Return on Equity

Bezeq The Israel Telecommunication Ltd. (BZQIF) has a ROE of 43.2%, above the Telecommunications sector average of 10.4%.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

ROE

43.20%

Return on Equity

43.20%

Return on Equity measures how efficiently a company uses shareholders' equity to generate profits. A higher ROE indicates better profitability relative to equity.

Average ROE (Comparison Companies)

Loading

ROE History

Loading

ROE Comparison

Loading

Bezeq The Israel Telecommunication Ltd. (BZQIF) FAQ

Bezeq The Israel Telecommunication Ltd. posts a ROE of 43.2%. That is above the Telecommunications sector average of 10.4%. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

For Telecommunications stocks, a ROE near 10.4% is typical. Bezeq The Israel Telecommunication Ltd.'s 43.2% is higher that level. That is roughly 315.3% above the sector mean. Whether that is a warning or an opportunity depends on growth outlook and other fundamentals shown elsewhere on Stockcircle.

Bezeq The Israel Telecommunication Ltd.'s ROE moves when the underlying profit, equity, or asset base changes. Cost cuts, pricing power, buybacks, write-downs, and cyclical swings can all shift the percentage. The latest reading is 43.2%; use YoY and peer views to separate noise from signal.

Context for BZQIF's ROE usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers (average 10.4%), and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Bezeq The Israel Telecommunication Ltd.'s other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Bezeq The Israel Telecommunication Ltd. against Telecommunications peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Telecommunications are more comparable, which makes gaps in ROE easier to interpret. Start with 43.2% here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.