BackSociete BIC SA Overview
Societe BIC SA

Societe BIC SA Debt to Equity

Societe BIC SA (BICEF) has a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.19, below the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 0.84.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

Debt to Equity

0.19

Debt to Equity

0.19

Debt-to-Equity ratio measures a company's financial leverage by comparing its total debt to shareholder equity. A lower D/E ratio generally indicates a more financially stable company with less risk.

Debt to Equity (Comparison Companies)

Loading

Debt to Equity History

Loading

Debt to Equity Comparison

Loading

Societe BIC SA (BICEF) FAQ

Societe BIC SA posts a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.19. That is below the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 0.84. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

For Consumer Discretionary stocks, a debt-to-equity ratio near 0.84 is typical. Societe BIC SA's 0.19 is lower that level. That is roughly 77.0% below the sector mean. Whether that is a warning or an opportunity depends on growth outlook and other fundamentals shown elsewhere on Stockcircle.

Societe BIC SA's debt-to-equity ratio of 0.19 comes from dividing a price-based measure by a related financial statistic. Changes can come from the stock price moving, the underlying fundamental shifting, or both. Track both the level and the trend — a rising multiple on falling fundamentals is a different story than a rising multiple on rising earnings.

Context for BICEF's debt-to-equity ratio usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers (average 0.84), and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Societe BIC SA's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Societe BIC SA against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in debt-to-equity ratio easier to interpret. Start with 0.19 here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.