BackBig 5 Sporting Goods Overview
Big 5 Sporting Goods Corp

Big 5 Sporting Goods Return on Equity

Big 5 Sporting Goods (BGFV) has a ROE of -68.63%, below the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 23.79%.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

ROE

-68.63%

Return on Equity

-68.63%

Return on Equity measures how efficiently a company uses shareholders' equity to generate profits. A higher ROE indicates better profitability relative to equity.

Average ROE (Comparison Companies)

Loading

ROE History

Loading

ROE Comparison

Loading

Big 5 Sporting Goods (BGFV) FAQ

Big 5 Sporting Goods (BGFV) currently reports a ROE of -68.63%. That is below the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 23.79%. Use the charts on this page to explore Big 5 Sporting Goods's ROE history and peer comparisons.

Big 5 Sporting Goods's ROE of -68.63% is lower than the Consumer Discretionary sector average of 23.79%. That is roughly 388.5% below the sector mean. A reading lower peers can reflect different growth expectations, capital structure, or profitability — so it is worth checking the peer comparison chart before drawing conclusions.

There is no universal 'good' ROE, but Big 5 Sporting Goods's current -68.63% should be judged against Consumer Discretionary norms (sector average: 23.79%) and against BGFV's own history. Strong, stable readings often indicate durable competitive advantage; volatile or declining ones deserve a closer look at margins and capital efficiency.

Start with the current ROE of -68.63%, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. The Consumer Discretionary average is 23.79%. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for Big 5 Sporting Goods, and consider following BGFV for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

Big 5 Sporting Goods is classified in the Consumer Discretionary sector. On ROE, it currently shows -68.63% versus a sector average near 23.79%. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Consumer Discretionary are usually more informative than comparing BGFV with unrelated industries.